1991-1995 Saturn
Less than the Sum of its Parts
Conceived by chairman Roger Smith to
reinvent the way GM makes and sells cars, Saturn was established as a
brand new, independent division in 1983. Far away from GM headquarters
(and its stiff, hierarchal culture) in Spring Hill, Tennessee, Saturn
was to be relatively free from corporate meddling and politics. Only
then could Saturn successfully accomplish his ambitious goals. Finally,
he said, America would beat the Japanese at their specialty: small cars.
A brand new facility was built. New
production methods adopted and in some cases, invented. New engines, new
materials, partnerships with suppliers, new inventory controls, even a
revolutionary labor contract was agreed to with the autoworker's union,
the UAW. It all looked, uh, very Japanese. And very un-GM.
Every bit as important as the production
of the car was the new (for GM) way the car was to be sold. A limited
number of retail outlets with exclusive territories in key markets was
planned. Franchise agreements required company-designed facilities and
substantial financial commitments by dealers. Continuing the radical
change in the way of doing business, a "no hassle, no haggle"
sales policy was to be strictly followed.
Production and quality problems forced
some delay, but to their credit, GM didn't revert to past practices. In
the old days, GM - and Ford and Chrysler for that matter - would've
simply shipped the product and dealt with any problems after it was
in the customer's hands. Not this time. GM was determined to get it
right.
Finally, in October of 1990, the first
Saturn was delivered in the U.S. It was the BIG EVENT.
With the passage of almost eight years,
enough time has elapsed to plainly see that Saturn has succeeded in some
of its goals, and come up short in others.
Although off 10% for 1997, sales have
been very good. The production plant often has worked three shifts at
maximum capacity. Plans are afoot for a new, larger model to give
current owners something to move up to.
It consistently ranks high among sales
satisfaction indexes. Remarkably, Saturn has been able to maintain both
their no discount policies and their no pressure sales method. People
like the Saturn buying experience. Once a customer, Saturn tries hard to
cultivate a relationship with every owner. We've all seen those folksy
ads and those somewhat bizarre homecoming events. Apparently they work.
More significantly, both resale value and reliability have been good,
although we are seeing some slippage in resale values recently.
The car itself, however, is rather
underwhelming. It doesn't lack for innovation or design thoughtfulness,
nor is it another numb and boring small car. It's just that on paper it
looks better than it is.
What's Available
For the 1991 model year, Saturn offered
four models and two body styles: The base SL sedan, the SL1 and SL2
sedans, and the SC Coupe. The SL and SL1 models received a 1.9 liter,
single overhead cam 4-cylinder engine generating 85hp. SL2 and SC models
sported larger tires on alloy wheels, a slightly plusher interior and a
twin-cam version of the same motor developing 124hp. Manual
transmissions were standard and most options were offered in packages.
1993 brought a new SC1 coupe with the same equipment levels as the SL1
sedan. Also added was a "cute" station wagon, available, not
suprisingly, as the SW1 and the SW2. In an effort to hold down costs,
alloy wheels were made optional on all models. 1994's were pretty much
carryover models with a few refinements here and there and 1995 brought
a new dash and a horsepower increase for the single-cam motor. In 1996
Saturn's first redesign hit the streets.
Exterior Design
The styling of the first generation
Saturns can best be described as clean, unique and distinctive. The top
SL2, SC2 and SW2 models look better than their cheaper siblings by
virtue of their body-colored bumpers, large wide tires and in most
cases, their alloy wheels. They also received an attractive full width
taillight/reflector treatment rather than two taillights flanking a
body-colored panel on the base models. The trunk has a low liftover
height, facilitating cargo loading and unloading
We don't usually comment on the design of
the engine compartment, but the Saturn's is truly exemplary. Easy to
identify service points and a minimum of clutter. Nice job.
One of the more innovative aspects of all
Saturns is their plastic body panels. Shopping carts, other car doors,
even stiff kicks are shrugged off with no evidence of contact.
Fit and finish are good, but the gaps
between plastic body panels could not be fitted with the tight
tolerances of steel and are rather wide. Consider it a tradeoff for the
ding free exterior you'll get to enjoy.
Interior Design
The controls and layout of every Saturn
are mostly well conceived, sporting that "tactile feedback"
deemed so important by many automotive reviewers. The original dashboard
design (1991-94) housed all controls and gauges in a hard plastic shell.
It looked ok but would have benefited greatly from proper padding. The
armrests on the door panels are thinly padded as well and do not appear
very durable.
Until 1995, Saturns came equipped with
annoying motorized seat belts. A split fold-down rear seat back was
standard, adding extra utility to a fairly large trunk. The dashboard
(cowl) and beltline (door sills) are low, imitating Japanese design
practices of the time.
Ride/Handling/Performance
When the Saturn was introduced, its
ride/handling compromise was one area where it stood at the top of its
class. Leaning decidedly toward the handling side of the equation, the
ride gives up little to other small cars. Although the Saturn possesses
typical small front-wheel drive understeer tendencies, it does manage to
delay its onset and rewards the driver with a suprisingly satisfying
level of control, even at brisk speeds and on all kinds of surfaces. As
you would expect, this is particularly true of the SL2 and SC2 models.
Acceleration is acceptable with the base
motor, very good with the twin-cam engine. Both have good low speed
torque characteristics. The 5-speed manual transmission is acceptable,
though not a standout. The 4-speed "fuzzy logic" automatic
transmission in most cases performs extremely well, with quick and
smooth upshifts and downshifts. On hilly terrain there is a tendency to
switch between third and fourth gear, but that is common with overdrive
automatic transmissions.
Comfort/Noise
All Saturns come with bucket seats and a
floor mounted transmission. Room and comfort for the front seat
passengers is good. Two rear seat passengers do ok as long as they
aren't over 6 feet and the front passengers do not have their seats all
the way back.
Noise is the Saturns biggest shortcoming.
Idling and low speed, around town noise and vibration are obtrusive. The
'91's are the worst offenders. 1992 brought new engine and transmission
mounting schemes and greatly increased noise insulation. It helped, but
the Saturn clearly lags in this area. Strong acceleration also brings
out a cacophony of noises that are not entirely pleasant. Conversely, at
highway speeds the Saturn is quieter than most others in its class.
Another thing we've noticed in several
Saturns: In cold weather these things buzz, creak, groan and generally
impart a feeling of horrendous quality. It gets worse as the cars age,
then it seems to level off after about 3 years.
If you live in Miami, this is not of
great concern. If you live in Boston, as we do, it is.
Safety
The Saturn received a good safety rating
as a result of its performance in government crash tests. Dual airbags
became standard in 1995. Previously, a driver bag was optional in 1992
and added to the standard equipment list in 1993. When Saturn received
standard dual airbags for 1995, it lost the annoying motorized seat
belts it had in earlier years. ABS brakes were optional in all years.
|
Is the
Twin-Cam an Oil Burner? |
|
We have seen, heard
and even experienced first-hand abnormal oil consumption in
twin-cam (SL2, SW2, SC2) Saturns. Consumption of one quart every
1000 to 1500 miles appears fairly common. This consumption rate
can set in early in the life of the car, so it is not attributable
to normal wear and tear.
Although
Saturn has a procedure to deal with this issue, they do not
acknowledge that a problem exists. They recommend that you bring
your car to a Saturn dealer to be put on an "oil consumption
watch". This entails bringing the car into your dealer every
few hundred miles so they can monitor the situation. Not very
convenient for the owner. Depending on the diagnosis, it can
involve valves, valve seals, piston rings, and even the pistons
themselves. Some owners report the fix only cures the oil burning
for a while. The procedure usually runs between $1000 and $1800,
depending on what is done. Depending on mileage, Saturn will often
pick up at least some of the tab.
A Saturn
representative told us that all Saturn engines should use no more
that one quart every 3000 miles. So why are all these Saturn
owners paying for this procedure?
|
Reliability
Everything that we have heard or seen
through our support line or known experiences indicates a spotty
reliability record, especially with the early examples. Oil consumption,
brakes, ticking odometers, warped brake rotors, and lousy power window
regulators are common complaints. Yet Saturn generally does well on
reliability surveys. Perhaps all that owner enthusiasm spills over into
their problem reporting!
Saturns came with a 3yr/36,000 mile
transferable factory warranty, so if you are looking at a '95 model
there may be some coverage left on the factory warranty.
Service
All Saturns came with a full stainless
steel exhaust system. These systems are good for at least 100,000 miles,
and often many more. It's a good bet you won't have to pay for an
exhaust system.
Both of Saturn's engines are overhead cam
designs. Unlike most of its competition, these engines have steel chains
for their timing belts. While not as quiet or smooth as a polymer belt,
they are far more durable and normally do not need replacement. The
procedure runs around $600.
Although not scheduled, another item that
you should start thinking about replacing around the 90-100,000 mile
mark is the water pump. Replacement was quoted at about $180 at the
local Saturn dealer. This is about average for the industry.
All in all, normal service costs appear
about average for Saturns and below its import competition.
Summary
If you must have a plastic car, then the
Saturn is your only choice. We would recommend that you stay completely
away from the '91 model and try to get into a '94 or '95. The '95 with
the upgraded (100hp) single overhead cam motor is probably your best
bet. Especially if you are considering a twin-cam model, ask about oil
consumption. Inquire if the valve seals or piston rings have been
replaced.
Taking into account all of the above, we
have to conclude that there are better values out there in the small car
segment. Undeniably, Saturns are fun-to-drive, offer a certain amount of
character, and have an enthusiastic following. But there are plenty of
small cars that will out-perform it at the same or lower cost, and many
of them have unquestionable exceptional reliability to boot.
Given some of the uncertainty surrounding
used Saturns, they would not make our short list of small cars to
consider.
|
Strengths |
Weaknesses |
- Good
handling/ride balance
- Excellent
handling
- Fun to Drive
- Large trunk for
class
- Body shrugs off
dings
|
- Engines are
rough and noisy at idle and on acceleration
- Body rattles,
creaks & groans
- Interior
materials questionable
- Spotty
reliability
|
|
General
Specifications |
|
|
General
Trim Levels: SL,
SL1, SL2
Body Styles: 2dr
Cpe, 4Dr Sdn, 4Dr Wgn
Dimensions &
Capacities
Weight: 2700lbs
Length: 176"
Wheelbase: Sdn/Wgn:
102"; Cpe: 99"
Width: 68"
Height: Sdn/Wgn:
53"; Cpe: 51"
EPA Class: Compact
Cargo Vol: Cpe:
10.9 cu ft; Sdn: 11.9 cu ft; Wgn: 24 cu ft
Fuel: 12.8 gal.
|
Mechanical
Layout:
Front-engine, front-wheel drive
Engines: 1.9L
(4cyl-85hp) '91-'94 1.9L (4cyl-100hp) '95 1.9L (4cyl-124hp)
Brakes: Front disc,
rear drum
Performance (manual
trans)
0-60mph: 11.1
seconds (85hp) 8.8 seconds (124hp) 1/4 mile: 18.2 seconds (85hp)
16.9 seconds (124hp) Top Speed: 100/115mph
EPA Mileage: SL,SL1
- 28/38 (city/hwy) SL2,SC2 - 24/33 (city/hwy)
|
Safety
ABS Brakes:
Optional Air Bags: None 91, driver opt '92, std '93 & '94;
driver & passenger std. '95
NHTSA Safety
Rating:
Driver ****
Passenger *****
Key:
Best: ***** No or
minor injuries probable Worst: * Serious injury probable
Original Warranty:
3yr/36,000 mile
bumper-to-bumper
|
|
Safety
Recalls |
|
1992 All
models with automatic transmission - On a limited number of
cars, the transaxle valve assemblies were improperly machined.
Vehicles may not properly engage in neutral or park, even though
the gear selector indicates the vehicle is in park or neutral,
it could be in reverse or drive. Have
Dealer replace the defective valve bodies.
1992,93 All
models - The generator electrical wiring is not protected
against excessive current flow which may be caused by an
electrical short circuit in the generator. Dealer
will install a new generator wiring harness with one that will
open as a fuse would under certain excessive current flow
conditions.
1993 All
models but limited to cars with 034 or 035 as the last three
digits of the date code tag on the brake master cylinder - The
brake booster assemblies were improperly manufactured. This can
cause the separation of the brake booster housing during a high
effort braking maneuver, resulting in total loss of braking
action. Dealer will replace
defective brake booster assemblies.
1993 SL2,
SC2, SW2 - The positive battery cable terminal at the starter
solenoid may be formed incorrectly, causing a short circuit. Dealer
will inspect and, if necessary, adjust the clearance between the
positive battery terminal and the starter solenoid housing.
1995 SL -
The steering gear pinion shaft was improperly heat treated which
may cause the shaft to fracture during vehicle operation,
causing complete loss of steering control. Dealer
will replace the manual steering assembly.
1995 All
models with automatic transmission - The automatic transaxle
park lock cable assembly was improperly adjusted making it
possible to shift from the park position with the ignition key
removed, or remove the ignition key with the shift lever
in a position other than park. Consumer should inspect
operation. Dealer will make adjustments if necessary. |
|